Skip to main content
· 4/3/2008

Rainsdon v. Farson (In Re Farson)

Citations

  • 387 B.R. 784
  • 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 1128
  • 2008 WL 913783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing this test and cases that did, and did not, find non-statutory insider status
  • applying Taylor and rejecting a trustee’s reliance on § 522(g)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jim D. Pappas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.