Skip to main content
· 8/31/1992

Raino v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Citations

  • 422 S.E.2d 98
  • 309 S.C. 255
  • 1992 S.C. LEXIS 184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in excluding blood test results where the evidence failed to establish who handled the blood
  • affirming trial court’s suppression of blood alcohol evidence when the identity of any party handling the blood was unknown even though the laboratory was in close proximity to the trauma where sample was drawn
  • “The defendant takes the plaintiff as he is found and the plaintiff is entitled.to recover damages resulting from the aggravation of a pre-existing condition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Harwell, Chandler, Finney, Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.