Rainier Monte Conley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that a plaintiff lacked standing in an action brought under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act
• concluding that an alleged FACTA digit-truncation injury was “not itself concrete and the alleged risk of identity theft [was] too speculative to satisfy the requirement of concreteness”
• holding that “absent a sufficient degree of risk, J. Crew’s alleged violation of FACTA is a bare procedural violation that does not create Article III standing” (cleaned up)
• noting that, as alleged, the information included on the receipt was insufficient to likely enable identity theft
• holding a FACTA non-compliant receipt that was not disclosed to a third party does not establish standing
• analyzing whether a procedural violation had a close relationship with “common law privacy torts and an action for breach of confidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).