Rainerman v. EAGLE NAT. BANK OF MIAMI

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding borrower was entitled to assert privilege against self-incrimination in post-judgment deposition held to aid in execution of final judgment where answers to the questions potentially bore on appellant’s criminal liability arising out of illegal banking transactions
• whether nature of proceeding \has narrowed the scope of inquiry\ to matters germane to potential criminal prosecution, a general objection to all discovery questions permissible
• order compelling deposition answers; entertained as appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).