Skip to main content
· 3/4/1987

Raine v. Lorimar Productions, Inc.

Citations

  • 71 B.R. 450
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding plaintiff sufficiently alleged an agreement where plaintiff offered “circumstantial evidence,” such as evidence “that many of [co-conspirator’s] former employees have now become important executives at [other co-conspirator entity]”
  • “Because this is an appeal from [a Bankruptcy Court’s] decision on a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, purely legal considerations are involved, and thus this court’s review must be de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Motley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.