Rain & Hail Insurance Service, Inc. v. Federal Crop Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that “pure questions of law should be reviewed de novo ”
• dismissing takings claim for failure to state a claim where breach of contract remedy was available
• finding plaintiffs did not have a color-able takings claim against the United States where that claim did not differ from a breach of contract claim trader the SRA
• explicitly finding § 6912(e) to be jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).