Rain and Hail Insurance Service, Inc. v. Paul Casper, Columbia Mutual Casualty Insurance, Dardof, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s refusal to enforce choice-of-law provision designating Iowa law as governing covenant not to compete because application of Iowa law would be contrary to fundamental policy under Nebraska law
• applying Nebraska law to an employment agreement’s noncompete clause choosing the application of Iowa law, which allowed modification of overly restrictive noncompete provisions, and affirming conclusion “Iowa law would be contrary to a fundamental policy of Nebraska”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).