Raimbeault v. Takeuchi Manufacturing (U.S.), Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[t]his Court will not disturb a trial justice's ruling on the admissibility of expert testimony absent an abuse of discretion\ (quoting Gallucci v. Humbyrd , 709 A.2d 1059 (R.I. 1998))
• affirming judgment as a matter of law on failure to warn claim and recognizing that a product is defective where the seller fails to warn of reasonably foreseeable dangers
• noting the functional equivalence of negligence and design defect analyses
• equating standards for negligence and design defect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).