Railway Labor Executives' Association v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Boston & Maine Corporation, Intervenors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “if one party has standing in an action, a court need not reach the issue of the standing of other parties when it makes no difference to the merits of the case” (internal citation omitted)
• leaving for the Commission to determine in the first instance the scope of protected “rights, privileges, and benefits”
• “An arbitrator’s interpretations of Commission regulations and views regarding transportation policy are subject to more searching review.”
• “An arbitrator’s interpretations of Commission regulations and views regarding transportation policy are subject to more searching review.”
• “[I]f one party has standing in an action, a court need not reach the issue of standing of other parties when it makes no difference to the merits of the case.”
• “The Taking Clause does not prohibit the government from taking private property. The Clause requires only that the government accomplish the taking in a particular way, namely, by paying for the property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).