Skip to main content
· 1/5/1895

Railway Co. v. Cox

Citations

  • 60 Ark. 106
  • 29 S.W. 38
  • 1895 Ark. LEXIS 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Exclusion of evidence . . . is not appropriate if the 3 failure to disclose was either substantially justified or harmless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.