Railton v. Bowen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “broad language of 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) would seem to permit a court to order transfer sua sponte”
• stating that the “broad language of 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) would seem to permit a court to order transfer sua sponte”
• “The broad language of 28 U.S.C. [§ ] 1404(a) would seem to permit a court to order transfer Sua sponte”
• “The broad language of 28 U.S.C. [§ ] 1404(a) would seem to permit a court to order transfer Sua sponte”
• “Whether a particular document is exempt under [exemption 5] depends not only on the intrinsic character of the document itself, but also on the role it played in the administrative process.”
• “It follows that each assertion of the privilege must be checked against the details of the deliberative process and the role of the documents to that process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).