Railsback v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant no longer had an absolute right to a jury shuffle after delaying his request so that he might obtain information traditionally acquired through voir dire
• holding that the defendant no longer had an absolute right to a jury shuffle after delaying his request so that he might obtain information traditionally acquired through voir dire
• holding that the defendant no longer had an absolute right to a jury shuffle after delaying his request so that he might obtain information traditionally acquired through voir dire
• explaining that any error in denying a request for jury shuffle is nonconstitutional in nature and requires harm that affected one of the defendant’s substantial rights
• appellant did not preserve issue for appellate review because it was not clear from the record what testimony expert was prohibited from giving and appellant made no offer of proof
• on appeal court will not reweigh evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).