Railroad Co. v. Smith
Citations
- 88 U.S. 255
- 22 L. Ed. 513
- 21 Wall. 255
- 1874 U.S. LEXIS 1363
Syllabus
<p>1. The law does not require a party to pay for imperfect and defective work the price stipulated for a perfect structure; and when that price is demanded, will allow him to deduct the difference between that price and the value of the inferior work, and also the amount of any direct damages flowing from existing defects, not exceeding the demand of the plaintiffs. The deduction is allowed in a suit upon the contract to prevent circuity of action.</p> <p>2. The plaintiffs entered into a contract with the Florida Railroad Company to construct for the company a swinging drawbridge over a river in Florida, in accordance with a submitted plan and tracings, for a stipulated price. In an action upon the contract for the price stipulated, the company set up part payment, and alleged defective construction of the bridge and delays and expenses incident thereto, and claimed by way of recoupment to deduct from the demand of the plaintiffs the damages thus sustained. On the trial the deposition of a witness was offered, to whom interrogatories were put inquiring, whether the structure and arrangements of the bridge caused any injury or damage, hindrance or delay, to the company in the running of its railroad; and whether any hindrance or delay was caused by the imperfect construction of the bridge to any vessel in the navigation of the river; and whether the structure or working of the bridge rendered it liable to be injured or destroyed by vessels navigating the river; and what number of hands were required to work the drawbridge, and what number would be necessary if it had been properly constructed ; Held, that the interrogatories were pertinent and proper in themselves; that the objection that they related to speculative damages did not apply to the first and last, in which the damages sustained would be the subject of actual estimation, and that the facts sought would at least have furnished elements to the jury for a just estimate of the damages to be recouped from the
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding higher taxes on those residents that receive a greater benefit was not an arbitrary classification
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Field
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.