Railroad Co. v. Dukes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The doctrine applies to claims composed of a series of separate acts that collectively constitute one unlawful practice . . .”
• “The doctrine applies to claims composed of a series of separate acts that collectively constitute one unlawful practice . . .”
• “The doctrine applies to claims composed of a series of separate acts that collectively constitute one unlawful practice . . .”
• “The doctrine applies to claims composed of a series of separate acts that collectively constitute one unlawful practice . . .”
• “[T]he [continuing violation] 1 Plaintiff objects to the Report-Recommendation insofar as Magistrate Judge Stewart “overlooked” that Defendants’ motion “did not identify the authority upon which it is relying or invoking to seek dismissal of the claims.” (Dkt. No. 83, at 3–4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).