Railing v. Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[A] document is entitled to work product protection if the primary motivating purpose behind the creation of the document was to aid in possible future litigation.\
• \[A] document is entitled to work product protection if the primary motivating purpose behind the creation of the document was to aid in possible future litigation.\
• \[A] document is entitled to work product protection if the primary motivating purpose behind the creation of the document was to aid in possible future litigation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).