Rahmings v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \highly prejudicial and inflammatory remarks require reversal unless the appellate court can determine from the record that the improper statements did not prejudice the defendant\
• “highly prejudicial and inflammatory remarks require rever sal unless the appellate court can determine from the record that the improper statements did not prejudice the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-01-16· cited 11×
• Stephenson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-03· cited 6×
• Irwin v. Singletary
  M.D. Florida· 1995-04-13· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Breedlove v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-03-04· cited 148×
• Pait v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-11· cited 83×
• Grant v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1967-02-01· cited 36×
• Chavez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-11-20· cited 23×
• Russell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-03-23· cited 11×
• Sims v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-05-22· cited 7×