· 9/21/2023
Rahim v. Obama
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the finding of intent to discriminate is a factual determination subject to the \clearly erroneous\ standard of review
- holding school board bears the \heavy burden of showing that actions that increased or continued the effects of the dual system serve important and legitimate ends\ (quotation marks omitted)
- affirming Court of Appeals' conclusion that District Court's failure to find the intentional operation of a dual school system was clearly erroneous
- affirming Court of Appeals’ conclusion that District Court’s failure to find the intentional operation of a dual school system was clearly erroneous
- holding school board bears the “heavy burden of showing that actions that increased or continued the effects of the dual system serve important and legitimate ends” (quotation marks omitted)
- approving Court of Appeals rejection of finding after identifying significant evidence overlooked by District Court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Paul L. Friedman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.