raheb v. mcdonaldcady

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing the standard for when the court of appeals may entertain issues not raised in the district court
• refusing to consider the newly raised legal issue of when a party discovered its loss under an insurance contract because deciding the issue “would require reference to the underlying factual record”
• a party’s failure to raise the “discovery . . . issue in the district court precludes [that] argument . . . on appeal”
• “contractual limitations provisions in insurance contracts commence the moment that the triggering event occurs, regardless of other policy provisions requiring that certain conditions be fulfilled before the insured has a right to enforce the contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).