Skip to main content
· 11/15/1917

Ragsdale v. Ragsdale

Citations

  • 35 Ohio C.C. Dec. 376
  • 30 Ohio C.A. 128

Syllabus

<p>CONTEMPT — ERROR</p> <p>Review in Contempt Proceedings Implied in Finding “Guilty.”</p> <p>Direct statutory provision for review of contempt proceedings when the party has been found guilty affords ground by analogy for prosecution of error in cases where there has been a refusal to punish for contempt.</p>

Judges: Gorman, Hamilton, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.