Skip to main content
· 8/2/2000

Ragsdale v. MOUNT SINAI MED. CENTER

Citations

  • 770 So. 2d 167
  • 2000 WL 1055787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, although incorrect drug report was detrimental to employee, employee had no claim against hospital because the report was not “intended to primarily or directly benefit” the employee
  • holding medical center that contracted with employer to conduct drug testing of employees owes a duty of reasonable care to employees, as harm to employees was foreseeable if drug test results were erroneously reported as positive.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jorgenson and Sorondo, Jj., and Nesbitt, Senior Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.