Ragland v. McLane Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that trial counsel was not ineffective when he elected to forego an objection to alleged hearsay and instead pursued the issue on cross-examination
• ruling that trial counsel was not ineffective when he elected to forego an obj ection to alleged hearsay and instead pursued the issue on cross-examination
• “Whether to admit evidence is a matter resting in the trial court’s sound discretion.”
• “[w]hile ‘area’near an ‘intersection’ is somewhat vague, the jury was nevertheless authorized to conclude that the officer was using the terms in a broad enough sense to encompass the location of the crime, based upon his familiarity with the area”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).