Skip to main content
· 1/8/1990

Ragland v. Davis

Citations

  • 301 Ark. 102
  • 782 S.W.2d 560
  • 1990 Ark. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting rule of lenity argument because essential elements of two offenses differed
  • rejecting rule of lenity argument because essential elements of two offenses differed
  • the crimes of cruelty to children in the second degree and third degree, as alleged in the indictment, could not be proven by the same evidence, and thus the rule of lenity did not apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Turner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.