Skip to main content
· 8/25/2016

Raghavendra v. Brill

Citations

  • 27 N.Y.3d 1186
  • 2016 NY Slip Op 83425
  • 38 N.Y.S.3d 95
  • 59 N.E.3d 1207
  • 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 2473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • directed verdict proper where lumber could deteriorate in condition, changing its value after purchase
  • affirmed grant of directed verdict for damages for lumber which could change in condition, which could affect value between purchase and destruction, and could not have been established as to fair market value from the purchase price
  • inventory subject to change or deterioration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.