Ragas v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is not the court’s duty to sift through the record in search for evidentiary support for a party’s opposition to summary judgment
• noting that Rule 56 does not require the Court to sift through the record in search of evidence to support a party’s motion for, or opposition to, summary judgment
• stating that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “do[] not impose upon the district court a duty to sift through the record in search of evidence to support a party’s opposition to summary judgment” (cleaned up)
• The Court need not “sift through the record in search of evidence to support a party’s opposition to summary judgment.”
• “The party opposing summary judgment is required to identify specific evidence in the record and to articulate the precise manner in which that evidence supports his or her claim.”
• \'Rule 56 does not impose upon the district court a duty to sift through the record in search of evidence to support a party's opposition to summary judgment.'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).