Raffield v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that state regulation prohibiting landing of red fish with a purse seine did not violate Mag-nuson-Stevens Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stoll v. Noel
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-10· cited 24×
• LOUISIANA SEAFOOD MNGT. COUNCIL, INC. v. Foster
  E.D. Louisiana· 1996-02-29· cited 8×
• Legal Environmental Assistance Foundation, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Brevard County, Florida
  Eleventh Circuit· 1994-01-12· cited 2×
• United States v. Berdeal
  S.D. Florida· 2009-01-22· cited 1×
• Ago
  Florida Attorney General Reports· 1992-01-08

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hughes v. Oklahoma
  Supreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 760×
• Maine v. Taylor
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-23· cited 702×
• Skiriotes v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1941-05-26· cited 243×
• SE FISHERIES v. Dept. of Nat. Resources
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-04-26· cited 118×
• United States Gypsum Company v. Green
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-04-01· cited 52×
• Gardner v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-31· cited 26×
• State v. Millington
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-11-21· cited 11×
• Livings v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-02-21· cited 6×
• State v. Raffield
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-10-20· cited 4×