Raffel v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[w]hen the words of an insurance contract-are, without violence, susceptible of two interpretations, that which will sustain the claim and cover the loss must, in preference, be adopted.”
• “When the words of an insurance contract are, without violence, susceptible of two interpretations, that which will sustain the claim and cover the loss must, in preference, be adopted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).