Raffel v. Perley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that survey and plan for land division are not improvement to real property for the purposes of G.L.c. 260, §2B
• survey and plans dividing property into individual lots does not constitute an “improvement” within the meaning of § 2B
• survey plans marking property off into individual lots do not constitute an improvement within c. 260, § 2B
• trial court’s dismissal reversed on grounds that plaintiff should have been able to present evidence that claims for relief did not accrue until plaintiff discovered error in survey
• trial court's dismissal reversed on grounds that plaintiff should have been able to present evidence that claims for relief did not accrue until plaintiff discovered error in survey
• architects and other design professionals should be encouraged to experiment, and deal in inexact sciences requiring judgment to anticipate factors incapable of precise measurement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).