Raffaele v. Marrama

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a child support order is not a “debt” under the FDCPA because the “obligation is not incurred in exchange for consumer goods or services, but instead was imposed by the state to force [the plaintiff] to fulfill his parental duty to support his child”
• holding that a child support order is not a 8 “debt” under the FDCPA because the “obligation is not incurred in exchange for consumer goods 9 or services, but instead was imposed by the state to force [the plaintiff] to fulfill his parental duty 10 to support his child”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).