Raffa v. Nissan Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The inquiry at the inception of the lawsuit is less stringent than the ultimate determination that the class is properly constituted.”
• “Defendants’ assertions are misplaced in the context of authorization of notice because they address the merits of the [plaintiffs’] claims.”
• “The inquiry at the inception of the lawsuit is less stringent than the ultimate determination that the class is properly constituted.”
• “[P]laintiffs need merely provide ‘some factual basis from which the court can determine if similarly situated potential plaintiffs exist.’ ”
• “[P]laintiffs are only required to demonstrate a factual nexus that supports a finding that potential plaintiffs were subjected to a common discriminatory scheme.”
• “[P]laintiffs are only required to demonstrate a factual nexus that supports a finding that potential plaintiffs were subjected to a common discriminatory scheme.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).