Skip to main content
· 2/10/1925

Raff v. Freiberg

Citations

  • 207 Ky. 246
  • 268 S.W. 1110
  • 1925 Ky. LEXIS 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that pro se briefs may be considered as if they were submitted under penalty of perjury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sampson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.