Raferty v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it “difficult to imagine how judicially-learned facts about different parties in a case similar to the one being tried would require disqualification”
• “The court’s previous holding, being a decision on a motion for a preliminary injunction, was itself only preliminary and subject to revision at any time.”
• “Facts learned by a judge in his or her judicial capacity regarding the parties before the court, whether learned in the same or a related proceeding, cannot be the basis for disqualification.”
• “We consistently hold that arguments not made in the district court are waived.”
• assuming there was an actionable interference in the first place
• Personal knowledge of evidentiary facts means extrajudicial knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).