Skip to main content
· 6/13/1972

Rafaela Euresti v. Richard Stenner, as Administrator of the Weld County General Hospital

Citations

  • 458 F.2d 1115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he legislative history and the expressed purposes of Congress indicate that the Act was passed to ensure that the indigent would be supplied sufficient hospital services when needed.”
  • “appellants are the intended beneficiaries of the Federal obligation sought to be enforced”
  • both contractual and statutory rights under Hill-Burton regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Hill, Doyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.