Rafael Rodriguez v. Floyd Bennett, Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he fact that § 2244(d)(2) does not cause exclusion of the federal petition’s time of pendency does not necessarily exclude the possibility of discretionary tolling on equitable grounds. Even though a petition is not entitled to the automatic tolling mandated by § 2244(d)(2
• “[T]he fact that § 2244(d)(2) does not cause exclusion of the federal petition’s time of pendency does not necessarily exclude the possibility of discretionary tolling on equitable grounds. Even though a petition is not entitled to the automatic tolling mandated by § 2244(d)(2
• “[T]he fact that § 2244(d)(2) does not cause exclusion of the federal petition’s time of pendency does not necessarily exclude the possibility of discretionary tolling on equitable grounds. Even though a petition is not entitled to the automatic tolling mandated by § 2244(d)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).