Skip to main content
· 3/22/1984

Rafael Martinez v. United States

Citations

  • 728 F.2d 694
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claim for “in excess of $100,000” was in “reasonable compliance” with requirement
  • property owner has burden of proof with regard to establishing the existence of damages and the amount of compensation to which he is entitled
  • “[P]resentation of a claim including ‘a sum certain’ is a jurisdictional requirement, absent compliance with which the courts have no jurisdiction to entertain the suit under the [FTCA].”
  • “presentation of a claim including “a sum certain” is a jurisdictional requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tate, Johnson, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.