Rafael Deitz v. Christine Money

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Ohio Court of Appeals denial of petitioner’s motion for leave to file a delayed appeal under Ohio Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(A
• holding that the Ohio Court of Appeals denial of petitioner’s motion for leave to file a delayed appeal under Ohio Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(A
• holding rule giving discretion to court to grant delayed appeals without specifying criteria for exercising discretion is not adequate state ground to deny habeas review
• “[T]he failure of [the petitioner’s] attorneys to file a timely appeal on his behalf, despite his purported request that they do so, would fall below an objective standard of reasonableness.” (citing Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 480 (2000))
• “Under the Strickland standard, the failure of [the defendant’s] attorneys to file a timely appeal on his behalf, despite his purported request that they do so, would fall below an objective standard of reasonableness.” (citing Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 480 (2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).