Skip to main content
· 9/12/1995

Rafael Arnoldo CASTILLO-MANZANAREZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent

Citations

  • 65 F.3d 793
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 12301
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7192
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We have twice approved the BIA’s rigorous standard of specificity, stating that the Notice of Appeal must inform the BIA of what aspects of the IJ’s decision were allegedly incorrect and why.”
  • mere bald generalizations, like “not supported by substantial evidence,” and “met burden of proof’
  • stressing the importance of clear instructions
  • involv- ing a petitioner with language difficulties
  • stressing the importance of clear instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Wiggins, Leavy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.