Skip to main content
· 7/31/2000

Rael v. Williams

Citations

  • 223 F.3d 1153
  • 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4551
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18314
  • 2000 WL 1051845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that conditions-of- confinement claims must be brought in civil rights suit, not in habeas petition
  • reiterating that “federal claims challenging the conditions of . . . confinement generally do not arise under” habeas statutes
  • holding the fact that an inmate is transferred to, or must reside in, a private prison does not raise a federal constitutional claim
  • holding the fact that an inmate is transferred to, or must reside in, a private prison does not raise a federal constitutional claim
  • holding the fact that an inmate is transferred to, or must reside in, a private prison does not raise a federal constitutional claim
  • stating that fact that inmate is transferred to, or must reside in, a private prison, “simply does not raise a federal constitutional claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brorby, Kelly, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.