· 7/31/2000
Rael v. Williams
Citations
- 223 F.3d 1153
- 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4551
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18314
- 2000 WL 1051845
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that conditions-of- confinement claims must be brought in civil rights suit, not in habeas petition
- reiterating that “federal claims challenging the conditions of . . . confinement generally do not arise under” habeas statutes
- holding the fact that an inmate is transferred to, or must reside in, a private prison does not raise a federal constitutional claim
- holding the fact that an inmate is transferred to, or must reside in, a private prison does not raise a federal constitutional claim
- holding the fact that an inmate is transferred to, or must reside in, a private prison does not raise a federal constitutional claim
- stating that fact that inmate is transferred to, or must reside in, a private prison, “simply does not raise a federal constitutional claim”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brorby, Kelly, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.