Rae v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The general rule is that hearsay testimony is not admissible in a restitution hearing unless defense counsel fails to properly object to the evidence.”
• “The trial court erroneously believed hearsay evidence was admissible in a restitution hearing. The general rule is that hearsay testimony is not admissible in a restitution hearing unless defense counsel fails to properly object to the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• A.J. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-24· cited 47×
• Branker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-15· cited 6×
• Riggins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-10· cited 3×
• CRICKET KATHLEEN TOOLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-20· cited 2×
• Schenk v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-11-07· cited 1×
• AJ v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-24

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-28· cited 20×
• Strickland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-23· cited 10×
• Langston v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-07· cited 7×
• Quick v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-09· cited 6×