Radparvar v. Estate of Jerry Vitucci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not improper to impeach Dr. Underwager by referring to his statements endorsing pedophilia as an “acceptable and reasonable lifestyle”
• expert’s testimony based on hypothetical questions that mirrored underlying facts of case was “tantamount to an endorsement of the credibility of the complaining child witness”
• judge's \refusal to include the specific language requested by the defendant did not amount to an abuse of discretion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).