Radkov v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[e]ven if ... the mailing ... somehow went awry without any fault on the part of the BIA, that circumstance alone would not excuse the failure to file a timeous motion to reopen”
• holding that “[e]ven if ... the mailing ... somehow went awry without any fault on the part of the BIA, that circumstance alone would not excuse the failure to file a timeous motion to reopen”
• concluding “[e]ven if, as the petitioners contend, the mailing in this case somehow went awry without any fault on the part of the [Bureau of Immigration Affairs], that circumstance alone would not excuse the failure to file a timeous motion to reopen”
• BIA did not abuse discretion in denying reissuance where record included envelope in which the order was mailed to attorney’s address of record and returned to the BIA as undeliverable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).