Radioshack Corp. v. ComSmart, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that alleged misrepresentations that relate exclusively to a future promise or an opinion of a future event, and are not susceptible of exact knowledge, are not actionable
• “Parol evidence is admissible to show that the making of a contract was procured by fraudulent representations”
• plaintiff must establish by clear and convincing evidence six elements in order to prevail on a claim for fraud
• “When the negotiations are completed by the execution of the contract, the transaction, so far as it rests on the contract, is merged in the writing.” (citing Bryant v. Troutman, 287 S.W.2d 918, 920 (Ky. 1956))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).