Federal Circuit· 4/25/2011
Radio Systems Corp. v. Accession, Inc.
Citations
- 638 F.3d 785
- 98 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1485
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 8465
- 2011 WL 1532146
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “Mr. Sullivan’s correspondence with Radio Systems was focused on generating a market for the Wed-git, not on enforcing or defending the ’141 patent”
- threat to pursue litigation unless payment for use of technology is made constitutes enforcement-related activity
- “Activities of the patentee that relate to the enforcement or defense of the patent can give rise to specific personal jurisdiction for such an action.”
- “Activities of the patentee that relate to the enforcement or defense of the patent can give rise to specific personal jurisdiction for such an action.”
- also noting that the patentee in Electronics for Imaging explicitly threatened litigation unless the plaintiff delivered $18,000,000.00
- “[0]nly those activities of the patentee that relate to the enforcement or defense of the patent can give rise to specific personal jurisdiction for such an action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bryson, Linn, Dyk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Impossible Foods Inc. v. Impossible X LLCNinth Circuit· 2023-09-12· cited 52×
- Jetblue Airways Corp. v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLCE.D. New York· 2013-02-28· cited 37×
- New World International, Inc. v. Ford Global Technologies, LLCFederal Circuit· 2017-06-08· cited 33×
- Atlantis Hydroponics, Inc. v. International Growers Supply, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 2013-01-03· cited 28×
- Oticon, Inc. v. Sebotek Hearing Systems, LLC.D. New Jersey· 2011-08-22· cited 24×
- Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Trans Video Electronics, Ltd.N.D. California· 2013-09-30· cited 18×
- Snaprays v. Lighting Defense GroupFederal Circuit· 2024-05-02· cited 12×
- Sarvint Technologies, Inc. v. OMsignal, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 2015-06-02· cited 11×
- Ali v. Carnegie Institution of WashingtonD. Oregon· 2013-05-28· cited 10×
- Authentify Patent Co. v. Strikeforce Technologies, Inc.W.D. Washington· 2014-07-31· cited 9×
- Venmill Industries, Inc. v. ELM, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2015-04-22· cited 9×
- Pfister v. Selling Source, LLCD. Nevada· 2013-03-20· cited 7×
- Vermont Juvenile Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Factory Direct Wholesale, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-08-22· cited 6×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Strategic Global Investments, Inc.S.D. California· 2017-04-17· cited 5×
- Ingeniador, LLC v. InterwovenD. Puerto Rico· 2012-05-15· cited 5×
- American Recreation Products, LLC v. Tennier Industries, Inc.E.D. Missouri· 2014-03-31· cited 4×
- Loyalty Conversion Systems Corp. v. American Airlines, Inc.E.D. Texas· 2014-09-02· cited 4×
- Cray Inc. v. Raytheon Co.W.D. Washington· 2016-04-05· cited 4×
- Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Electronic Custom Distributors, Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-09-15· cited 3×
- TomTom, Inc. v. Norman IP Holdings, LLCD. Massachusetts· 2012-09-04· cited 2×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
- Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2008-01-28· cited 651×
- Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'antisemitismeNinth Circuit· 2006-01-12· cited 490×
- Bancroft & Masters, Inc., a California Corporation v. Augusta National Inc., a Georgia CorporationNinth Circuit· 2000-08-18· cited 484×
- Red Wing Shoe Company, Inc. v. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1998-06-30· cited 247×
- Avocent Huntsville Corp. v. Aten Intern. Co., Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2008-12-16· cited 203×
- Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1985-03-25· cited 196×
- Electronics for Imaging, Inc. v. Jan R. Coyle and Kolbet LabsFederal Circuit· 2003-09-04· cited 177×
- Autogenomics, Inc. v. Oxford Gene Technology Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2009-05-18· cited 146×
- Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2006-04-07· cited 143×
- Masada Investment Corp. v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court· 1985-08-12· cited 93×
- Campbell Pet Co. v. MialeFederal Circuit· 2008-09-18· cited 78×
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. AbrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-09-19· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.