Skip to main content
· 8/29/1933

Radio Corporation v. Cable Radio Tube Corporation

Citations

  • 66 F.2d 778
  • 19 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 104
  • 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that options to terminate in case of “breach, bankruptcy, insolvency or the appointment of a receiver” do not exempt a contract from the Statute of Frauds because they are “contingencies over which [the parties] had no control”
  • noting potential unfairness to defendant where contempt proceedings used to resolve substantial dispute
  • noting potential unfairness to defendant where contempt 8 proceedings used to resolve substantial dispute
  • noting potential unfairness to 2 defendant where contempt proceedings used to resolve “substantial dispute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manton, Swan, Hand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.