Radiator Specialty Co. v. Micek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice
• noting that while the Supreme Court had twice applied the pre-Deklewa rule, that rule was not stare decisis because the Court was merely reviewing the Board's interpretation and not announcing its own

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).