Radford v. State
Citations
- 35 Tex. 15
Syllabus
<p>1. In a trial for theft of a box of tobacco, the court below admitted, aa evidence of the ownership alleged in the indictment, a bill of lading, with which the defendant had no connection, and the authenticity of which was not otherwise sustained than by the opinion of a witness. Held, error.</p> <p>3. Indictment for theft alleged that the property was taken from the possession of the Galveston agent of a New York steamship company; but the evidence proved that it was taken from the vessel, and had never passed into the possession of the agent. Held, that this was a fatal variance between the allegation and the proof.</p> <p>3. A conviction for theft cannot be sustained when there was no proof of the value of the property stolen.</p>
Judges: Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Winkley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-12-04· cited 64×
- Julia Winkley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-12-04
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1876-07-01
- Meyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
- Cady v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1878-07-01
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1883-11-07
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.