Rader v. Superior Court of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying primarily the fiduciary-duty exception but also the crime-fraud exception in holding that officers’ communications with attorneys were not protected by the attorney-client privilege
• applying primarily the fiduciary-duty exception but also the crimefraud exception in holding that officers' communications with attorneys were not protected by the attorney-client privilege
• applying primarily the fiduciary-duty exception but also the crime-fraud exception in holding that officers' communications with attorneys were not protected by the attorney-client privilege
• forty percent shareholder allowed to pierce claim of privilege asserted by one owing a fiduciary duty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).