Skip to main content
· 1/26/1996

Rader v. Deshler

Citations

  • 28 Pa. D. & C.4th 40
  • 1996 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a “reviewing court will not disturb [a] conviction” even when there are “alternative explanations for the government’s evidence”
  • “The conspiracy may be proven through circumstantial evidence and by inferences based on the actions of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.