Rader v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “general lack of communication with the homeowners” is probative of fraudulent intent
• holding that defendant's general lack of communication with client about project's problems was further evidence of his fraudulent intent
• holding that a “general lack of communication with the homeowners” about the problems with the project is probative of fraudulent intent
• noting that failure to apply for a permit gives rise to an inference of fraudulent intent
• commenting that a request for an advance accompanied by a promise to complete followed by a failure to complete was probative
• finding that “Rader’s general lack of communication with the homeowners about the problems with the project is further evidence that he did not intend to complete the contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).