Radaker v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that we will not disturb the district court's factual determinations when supported by substantial evidence
• providing that in the context of a joint venture—governed by the laws of partnerships—a joint venturer is liable for• another joint venturer's fraudulent act that is completed within the scope of the joint venture's enterprise
• providing that in the context of a joint venture—governed by the laws of partnerships—a joint venturer is liable for another joint venturer's fraudulent act that is completed within the scope of the joint venture's enterprise
• stating that \principles of law regarding general partnerships encompass joint ventures\
• adopting the implied warranty of habitability to protect purchasers of new homes \who are victims of latent hearing on the motion for summary judgment and orally ruled on that motion from the bench. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (01 I947A defects in construction\
• adopting the implied warranty of habitability to protect purchasers of new homes \who are victims of latent hearing on the motion for summary judgment and orally ruled on that motion from the bench. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (01 I947A defects in construction\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).