Skip to main content
· 2/2/2006

Rad Concepts, Inc. v. Wilks Precision Instrument Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 891 A.2d 1148
  • 167 Md. App. 132
  • 2006 Md. App. LEXIS 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, under sections 2-609 and 2-610, after a party shipped goods and made multiple requests for payment that were not answered, that party could suspend future shipments until payment or “acceptable assurances” were received
  • appellate court need not address a party’s contention that is unsupported by legal argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panel: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.